Drone-zapping laser weapons now effective (and cheap) reality

Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

Gianluca Sarri, Queen's University Belfast

Not a sound made, no human casualties, no messy explosions. A lethal, multimillion-dollar drone cleanly taken out by a shot that cost less than a good bottle of wine.

If you think this is a scene from a sci-fi movie, think again. Only a few days ago, a team of UK scientists and engineers successfully demonstrated that this is viable technology that could find its way on to the battlefield in the next five to ten years.

DragonFire, a £30 million technology programme launched in 2017 and involving the UK government agency Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, missiles manufacturer MBDA, aerospace company Leonardo UK and defence technology company QinetiQ, has passed its first field test by shooting down several drones off the coast of Scotland using laser beams.

Drones are unmanned and semi-automatic aircrafts capable of delivering deadly damage with pinpoint accuracy. They feature heavily on modern battlefields, including the Ukrainian war and the commercial naval routes in the Red Sea.

Shooting them down is not easy and typically involves firing missiles that cost up to £1 million each. While usually effective, defensive systems of this kind are costly and carry a significant risk of causing collateral damage; if a missile misses its target, it will eventually land somewhere and still explode.

However, you don’t have to cause a spectacular explosion to deactivate a drone; interfering with its control and navigation systems is more than enough. This is a job that a laser beam can do. Lasers are nothing but particularly bright and directional beams of light – a particular kind of electromagnetic radiation. A sufficiently powerful laser can interfere with any electronic device, causing it to malfunction.

Compared to standard missiles, a high-power laser system has a range of strategic advantages. It is surprisingly cheap to operate. Running DragonFire for ten seconds costs the equivalent of using a heater for an hour (less than £10 per shot).

Lasers are also free from the risk of collateral damage. Even if a laser misses its target, it will keep on propagating upwards and eventually be absorbed and scattered in the atmosphere. A laser is a beam of light, so it only propagates in straight lines, regardless of gravity. Also, they usually cover a small area of the order of a few millimetres – they are akin to a surgical intervention.

Lasers are therefore the defensive weapon par excellence; they can only be used to stop incoming threats, not cause significant harm. Lasers are also far less susceptible to countermeasures. By its very nature of being a beam of light, lasers travel at the fastest possible speed: the speed of light. Once a laser beam is fired, there is nothing else in nature that can catch up with it and neutralise it.

Laser beams have been used on the battlefield for quite some time. They are mainly used for tracking targets, remote sensing and precision aiming. However, this is the first time that this type of technology has proven effective in a disruptive application.

Challenges remain

The reason it has taken so long to develop this weapon is that to disable a drone, you need a laser beam with significant intensity.

However, if the laser beam is too powerful, it can strongly interact with the air in the atmosphere, causing it to be absorbed or scattered. One needs to strike the perfect balance of beam parameters, such as its wavelength power and shape, to make sure that it can propagate over long distances without significant degradation.

A laser beam will also be particularly sensitive to atmospheric conditions. The presence of fog, rain, or clouds can significantly affect its performance.

Due to the increasing threat posed by drones and subsonic missiles on a global scale, the UK defence ministry is now accelerating the development of this technology, with the expectation of having it fielded on war vessels in the next five to ten years.

Several technical and scientific issues still need to be addressed. For example, keeping the pointing of the laser stable on a moving platform (such as a cruiser in choppy waters) is not a simple task. It is like trying to hit the bullseye on a dartboard while standing on a balance board. However, this will only affect the accuracy of the weapon, without increasing the risk of collateral damage.

It will also be necessary to decouple the laser system performance from the weather conditions. Water droplets and air drafts can scatter or absorb the laser, reducing its effects. One would need to precisely factor in variable weather conditions in the preparation of the beam to be fired. While this is not an impossible task, it is technically difficult.

A structured training programme must also be established to ensure soldiers can efficiently operate such a high-tech system.

Nonetheless, these first tests demonstrate the viability and efficacy of this weapon, which promises to revolutionise modern warfare in the coming years.

Gianluca Sarri, Professor at the School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.